• We are a multilingual website again. Read the notice about this.
  • Understand AI use at MyPTSD: all AI use is explained in our AI help page. AI use is by choice here. It exists if you want it, but does nothing unless you choose to use it.

Artist With Demons

  • Post starter Post starter Scorpigrow
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
It would be nice if they changed it, disorder and crazy go all too well together. But having a battle injury does carry a more positive connotation. I vote yes! In fact, I'm not waiting for "Them" to change it. I deem it the new title! I have spoken!
 
When you take a serious look at it, it's not just the Stress that is the major factor, it's the Anxiety that the majority of military personnel have trouble with. I have always explained PTSD as an umbrella term for a myriad of symptoms. For instance nearly everyone with PTSD gets a diagnosis of PTSD with an Anxiety disorder and some degree of depression, and when you look at the ailments that follow, you get bruixism, IBS, hypervigilence, etc, etc, and not everyone suffers from the exact same symptoms or intensity. Therefor it's a disorder.

Lets just call it combat stress and be done with it. It's not an injury. It's the mind not being able to cope with what it is seeing, that is why if you catch a young veteran early enough and they have only had one deployment, their is a great chance they can return to an almost normal life. But when you add trauma after trauma and deployment after deployment, there is little hope. They major key is debrief and counselling. Its not plausible, but if they were to debrief a veteran after each episode where there was trauma, the amount of veterans coming home with PTSD would be greatly reduced. Have a look at our day to day emergency services, they still get cases, but the numbers are minimal, why, because they debrief after every major incident.
Compulsory debrief training carried out over a few days at the end of deployment followed up by another period three months after deployment would catch quite a few too. Ask any veteran with PTSD and they would agree.
 
Compulsory Pre-Deployment training would do well and mandatory awareness training for Commanders, First Sergeants & personnelists
 
I don't think that they will change the actual diagnosis title. It is tied to reimbursement rates, and you mess with money, you mess with the system. What worries me is that it will be split into three different diagnostice codes for reimbursement, really soon. This means that benefits will be tied to what level you are defined as, which is already way too subjective. We will have the unspecified PTSD (ICD-10-CM F43.10) acute PTSD and chronic PTSD (ICD-10-CM F43.12). They have not defined what chronic is and unspecified is defined as symptoms lasting greater then 3 months. They have made a knew catagory taking it from adjustment reaction to "Reaction to severe stress, and adjustment disorders." If you thought the providers are confused know, just wait utnil ICD-10 is fully implemented. Remember, the code tells them how much they get reimbursed and there is a disincentive to code at the higher levels for managed care (e.g. VA, Military health and Affordable Health Care Act.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Donation drives

2026 Donation Goal

Goal
$1,800.00
Earned
$910.00
This donation drive ends in
0 hours, 0 minutes, 0 seconds
  50.6%

Trending content

Featured content

Back
Top Bottom